Impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines on Covid-19 incidence and mortality in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Given the waning of vaccine effectiveness and the shifting of the most dominant strains in the U.S., it is imperative to understand the association between vaccination coverage and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) disease and mortality at the community levels and whether that association might vary according to the dominant SARS-CoV-2 strains in the U.S. METHODS: Generalized estimating equations were used to estimate associations between U.S. county-level cumulative vaccination rates and booster distribution and the daily change in county-wide Coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) risks and mortality during Alpha, Delta and Omicron predominance. Models were adjusted for potential confounders at both county and state level. A 2-week lag and a 4-week lag were introduced to assess vaccination rate impact on incidence and mortality, respectively. RESULTS: Among 3,073 counties in 48 states, the average county population complete vaccination rate of all age groups was 50.79% as of March 11th, 2022. Each percentage increase in vaccination rates was associated with reduction of 4% (relative risk (RR) 0.9607 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9553, 0.9661)) and 3% (RR 0.9694 (95% CI: 0.9653, 0.9736)) in county-wide COVID-19 cases and mortality, respectively, when Alpha was the dominant variant. The associations between county-level vaccine rates and COVID-19 incidence diminished during the Delta and Omicron predominance. However, each percent increase in people receiving a booster shot was associated with reduction of 6% (RR 0.9356 (95% CI: 0.9235, 0.9479)) and 4% (RR 0.9595 (95% CI: 0.9431, 0.9761)) in COVID-19 incidence and mortality in the community, respectively, during the Omicron predominance. CONCLUSIONS: Associations between complete vaccination rates and COVID-19 incidence and mortality appeared to vary with shifts in the dominant variant, perhaps due to variations in vaccine efficacy by variant or to waning vaccine immunity over time. Vaccine boosters were associated with notable protection against Omicron disease and mortality.

Herpes zoster (HZ) vaccine coverage and confidence in Italy: a Nationwide cross-sectional study, the OBVIOUS project.

BACKGROUND: Herpes Zoster is an age dependent disease and as such it represents a problem in the Italian social context, where the demographic curve is characterized by an overrepresentation of the elderly population. Vaccines against Herpes Zoster are available, safe and effective, however coverage remains sub-optimal. This study was therefore conducted to examine the variations in Herpes Zoster vaccine uptake and confidence across different regions in Italy. METHODS: This study utilized a cross-sectional computer-assisted web interview (CAWI) methodology. The survey was conducted by Dynata, an online panel provider, and involved 10,000 respondents recruited in Italy between April 11 and May 29, 2022. The sample was stratified based on geographic region, gender, and age group. Data management adhered to European Union data protection regulations, and the survey covered demographics, living conditions, and vaccination against herpes zoster (HZ), following the BeSD framework. RESULTS: The findings indicate regional disparities in herpes zoster vaccine uptake across Italy. Notably, the Islands region exhibits a particularly low vaccination rate (2.9%), highlighting the need for targeted interventions. The multivariate regression analysis showed that sociodemographic factors, limited access to healthcare services, and inadequate awareness of vaccine eligibility contribute to the lower uptake observed in this region. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this research emphasizes regional disparities in herpes zoster (HZ) vaccination uptake in Italy. Demographic, socioeconomic, and geographic factors impact individuals' willingness to receive the vaccine. The study highlights the importance of awareness of vaccine eligibility and accessible vaccination facilities in increasing uptake rates.

Last-mile delivery increases vaccine uptake in Sierra Leone.

Less than 30% of people in Africa received a dose of the COVID-19 vaccine even 18 months after vaccine development1. Here, motivated by the observation that residents of remote, rural areas of Sierra Leone faced severe access difficulties2, we conducted an intervention with last-mile delivery of doses and health professionals to the most inaccessible areas, along with community mobilization. A cluster randomized controlled trial in 150 communities showed that this intervention with mobile vaccination teams increased the immunization rate by about 26 percentage points within 48-72 h. Moreover, auxiliary populations visited our community vaccination points, which more than doubled the number of inoculations administered. The additional people vaccinated per intervention site translated to an implementation cost of US $33 per person vaccinated. Transportation to reach remote villages accounted for a large share of total intervention costs. Therefore, bundling multiple maternal and child health interventions in the same visit would further reduce costs per person treated. Current research on vaccine delivery maintains a large focus on individual behavioural issues such as hesitancy. Our study demonstrates that prioritizing mobile services to overcome access difficulties faced by remote populations in developing countries can generate increased returns in terms of uptake of health services3.

Completion of multidose vaccine series in early childhood: current challenges and opportunities.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Completion of all doses in multidose vaccine series provides optimal protection against preventable infectious diseases. In this review, we describe clinical and public health implications of multidose vaccine series noncompletion, including current challenges to ensuring children receive all recommended vaccinations. We then highlight actionable steps toward achieving early childhood immunization goals. RECENT FINDINGS: Although coverage levels are high for most early childhood vaccinations, rates of completion are lower for vaccinations that require multiple doses. Recent research has shown that lower family socioeconomic status, a lack of health insurance coverage, having multiple children in the household, and moving across state lines are associated with children failing to complete multidose vaccine series. These findings provide contextual evidence to support that practical challenges to accessing immunization services are impediments to completion of multidose series. Strategies, including reminder/recall, use of centralized immunization information systems, and clinician prompts, have been shown to increase immunization rates. Re-investing in these effective interventions and modernizing the public health infrastructure can facilitate multidose vaccine series completion. SUMMARY: Completion of multidose vaccine series is a challenge for immunization service delivery. Increased efforts are needed to address remaining barriers and improve vaccination coverage in the United States.

Trust in public health institutions moderates the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine discussion groups on Facebook.

BACKGROUND: Distrust and partisan identity are theorized to undermine health communications. We examined the role of these factors on the efficacy of discussion groups intended to promote vaccine uptake. METHOD: We analyzed survey data from unvaccinated Facebook users (N = 371) living in the US between January and April 2022. Participants were randomly assigned to Facebook discussion groups (intervention) or referred to Facebook's COVID-19 Information Center (control). We used Analysis of Covariance to test if the intervention was more effective at changing vaccination intentions and beliefs compared to the control in subgroups based on participants' partisan identity, political views, and information trust views. RESULTS: We found a significant interaction between the intervention and trust in public health institutions (PHIs) for improving intentions to vaccinate (P = .04), intentions to encourage others to vaccinate (P = .03), and vaccine confidence beliefs (P = .01). Among participants who trusted PHIs, those in the intervention had higher posttest intentions to vaccinate (P = .008) and intentions to encourage others to vaccinate (P = .002) compared to the control. Among non-conservatives, participants in the intervention had higher posttest intentions to vaccinate (P = .048). The intervention was more effective at improving intentions to encourage others to vaccinate within the subgroups of Republicans (P = .03), conservatives (P = .02), and participants who distrusted government (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Facebook discussion groups were more effective for people who trusted PHIs and non-conservatives. Health communicators may need to segment health messaging and develop strategies around trust views.

Racial and ethnic disparities in influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant women in the United States: The contribution of vaccine-related attitudes.

OBJECTIVE: Racial and ethnic disparities in influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant women in the United States have been documented. This study assessed the contribution of vaccine-related attitudes to coverage disparities. METHODS: Surveys were conducted following the 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 influenza seasons in a US research network. Using electronic health record data to identify pregnant women, random samples were selected for surveying; non-Hispanic Black women and influenza-unvaccinated women were oversampled. Regression-based decomposition analyses were used to assess the contribution of vaccine-related attitudes to racial and ethnic differences in influenza vaccination. Data were combined across survey years, and analyses were weighted and accounted for survey design. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 41.2% (721 of 1748) for 2019-2020 and 39.3% (706 of 1798) for 2020-2021. Self-reported influenza vaccination was higher among non-Hispanic White respondents (79.4% coverage, 95% CI 73.1%-85.7%) than Hispanic (66.2% coverage, 95% CI 52.5%-79.9%) and non-Hispanic Black (55.8% coverage, 95% CI 50.2%-61.4%) respondents. For all racial and ethnic groups, a high proportion (generally >80%) reported being seen for care, recommended for influenza vaccination, and offered vaccination. In decomposition analyses, vaccine-related attitudes (e.g., worry about vaccination causing influenza; concern about vaccine safety and effectiveness) explained a statistically significant portion of the observed racial and ethnic disparities in vaccination. Maternal age, education, and health status were not significant contributors after controlling for vaccine-related attitudes. CONCLUSIONS: In a setting with relatively high influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant women, racial and ethnic disparities in coverage were identified. Vaccine-related attitudes were associated with the disparities observed.

County-level barriers in the COVID-19 vaccine coverage index and their associations with willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine across racial/ethnic groups in the U.S.

Background: County-level vaccination barriers (sociodemographic barriers, limited healthcare system resources, healthcare accessibility barriers, irregular healthcare seeking behaviors, history of low vaccination) may partially explain COVID-19 vaccination intentions among U.S. adults. This study examined whether county-level vaccination barriers varied across racial/ethnic groups in the U.S. and were associated with willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. In addition, this study assessed whether these associations differed across racial/ethnic groups. Methods: This study used data from the REACH-US study, a large online survey of U.S. adults (N = 5,475) completed from January 2021-March 2021. County-level vaccination barriers were measured using the COVID-19 Vaccine Coverage Index. Ordinal logistic regression estimated associations between race/ethnicity and county-level vaccination barriers and between county-level vaccination barriers and willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Models adjusted for covariates (age, gender, income, education, political ideology, health insurance, high-risk chronic health condition). Multigroup analysis estimated whether associations between barriers and willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine differed across racial/ethnic groups. Results: American Indian/Alaska Native, Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino ELP [English Language Preference (ELP); Spanish Language Preference (SLP)], and Multiracial adults were more likely than White adults to live in counties with higher overall county-level vaccination barriers [Adjusted Odd Ratios (AORs):1.63-3.81]. Higher county-level vaccination barriers were generally associated with less willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, yet associations were attenuated after adjusting for covariates. Trends differed across barriers and racial/ethnic groups. Higher sociodemographic barriers were associated with less willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine (AOR:0.78, 95% CI:0.64-0.94), whereas higher irregular care-seeking behavior was associated with greater willingness to receive the vaccine (AOR:1.20, 95% CI:1.04-1.39). Greater history of low vaccination was associated with less willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine among Black/African American adults (AOR:0.55, 95% CI:0.37-0.84), but greater willingness to receive the vaccine among American Indian/Alaska Native and Hispanic/Latino ELP adults (AOR:1.90, 95% CI:1.10-3.28; AOR:1.85, 95% CI:1.14-3.01). Discussion: Future public health emergency vaccination programs should include planning and coverage efforts that account for structural barriers to preventive healthcare and their intersection with sociodemographic factors. Addressing structural barriers to COVID-19 treatment and preventive services is essential for reducing morbidity and mortality in future infectious disease outbreaks.

Kindergarten Vaccination Status in California After Changes to Medical Exemption Policy.

This study evaluates changes in medical exemptions and geographic distribution of kindergarteners in California not up to date on vaccination after changes to state legislation.

Agrupamento dos municípios goianos pela cobertura vacinal / Grouping of municipalities in Goiás by vaccination coverage

Análise de agrupamento com o objetivo de proporcionar uma nova visualização da cobertura vacinal atingida pelos municípios e possibilitar uma maior flexibilidade na avaliação do alcance da meta proposta, de modo a canalizar os esforços para a solução de problemas relacionados à baixa cobertura, direcionando as ações para aqueles municípios que carecem de maior atenção. Trata-se de um método exploratório multivariado, cuja finalidade é explorar os grupos que naturalmente se formam dentro de um conjunto de dados conhecidos

Cluster analysis with the aim of providing a new visualization of the vaccination coverage achieved by municipalities and enabling greater flexibility in assessing the achievement of the proposed target, in order to channel efforts towards solving problems related to low coverage, directing actions towards those municipalities that require greater attention. This is a multivariate exploratory method, whose purpose is to explore the groups that naturally form within a set of known data

Cobertura vacinal e o movimento antivacina: o impacto na saúde pública no Brasil / Vaccination coverage and anti-vaccine movement: the impact on public health in Brazil / Cobertura de vacunación y movimiento antivacuna: el impacto en la salud pública en Brasil

A vacina constitui um dos principais métodos de prevenção contra doenças. Em 1973, o Brasil criou o Programa Nacional de Imunizações a fim de promover a imunização gratuita para a população, o que mais tarde tornou o país em referência mundial em vacinação. No entanto, a recusa vacinal ainda é um grande problema de saúde pública, sendo o movimento antivacina um dos destaques dessa realidade. Dessa forma, o objetivo deste artigo é avaliar como o movimento antivacina impacta na saúde pública no Brasil através da diminuição da cobertura vacinal. Trata-se de uma pesquisa de metodologia mista, com uma primeira etapa qualitativa, composta de uma revisão integrativa nas plataformas PubMed, LILACS e SciELO, no período de 2010 a 2020, e uma pesquisa documental em portais de movimentos antivacina; e uma segunda etapa quantitativa, em que foi realizado um estudo epidemiológico do tipo ecológico, com consulta nas bases eletrônicas do Datasus e no Sistema de Informações do Programa Nacional de Imunizações (SI-PNI), no período de 2010 a 2022. No período investigado, apenas em 2015 o Brasil alcançou a meta preconizada de cobertura vacinal, diferentemente dos anos seguintes, que apresentaram oscilações preocupantes. As publicações apresentam argumentos utilizados pelos grupos antivacina, evidenciados entre 2015 e 2019, período em que os dados de cobertura vacinal oscilaram. Assim, conclui-se que a ascensão do movimento antivacina é um dos fatores que influenciaram na queda da vacinação no Brasil, a exemplo do sarampo e da febre amarela.

The vaccine is one of the main methods of preventing diseases. Since 1973, Brazil created the National Immunization Program to ensure free immunization to the population, which later made the country a world reference in vaccination. However, vaccine refusal is still a great public health issue, and the anti-vaccine movement stand out in this reality. Thus, the purpose of this article is to evaluate how the anti-vaccine movement affects public health in Brazil with vaccination coverage reduction. This is a mixed methodology study, with first a qualitative step, composed of an integrative review in the platforms PubMed, LILACS, and SciELO, in the period from 2010 to 2020,and a documental research in portals of anti-vaccination movements; and a second quantitative step, where an epidemiological study of the ecological type was carried out, with consultation in the electronic databases of DATASUS and in the Information System of the National Immunization Program (SI-PNI) in the period of 2010 to 2022. In the investigative period, only in 2015 Brazil managed to reach the recommended vaccination coverage goal, unlike in the following years, which showed worrying fluctuations. The publications summarize arguments used by the anti-vaccination groups, evidenced between 2015 and 2019, a period in which the vaccination coverage data fluctuated. Therefore, it is clear that the rise of the anti-vaccination movement is a factor that influenced the drop in vaccination numbers in Brazil, with yellow fever and measles as examples.

La vacuna es uno de los principales métodos de prevención de enfermedades. En 1973, Brasil creó el Programa Nacional de Inmunización con el fin de promover la inmunización gratuita para la población, lo que luego convirtió al país en un referente mundial en vacunación. Sin embargo, la negativa de la vacuna sigue siendo un problema importante en la salud pública, y el movimiento antivacunas es uno de los aspectos más destacados de esta realidad. Así, el objetivo de este artículo es evaluar cómo el movimiento antivacunas impacta en la salud pública en Brasil mediante la disminución de la cobertura de vacunación. Se trata de un estudio epidemiológico mixto, con una primera etapa cualitativa, consistente en una revisión integradora en las plataformas PubMed, Lilacs y SciELO, en el período de 2010 a 2020, y una investigación documental en portales de movimientos antivacunas; y una segunda etapa cuantitativa, en la que se realizó un estudio epidemiológico de tipo ecológico, con consulta en las bases de datos electrónicas de DATASUS y en el Sistema de Información del Programa Nacional de Inmunización (SI-PNI), en el período de 2010 a 2022. Entre eses años, solo el año 2015 logró alcanzar la meta recomendada, a diferencia de los años siguientes, que mostraron fluctuaciones preocupantes en la cobertura de vacunación. Las publicaciones mostraron los argumentos utilizados por los grupos antivacina, evidenciados entre 2015 y 2019, período en que los datos de cobertura de la vacuna fluctuaron. Así, se concluye que la asunción del movimiento antivacunación es uno de los factores que influye en la caída de la vacunación en Brasil, como en el sarampión y la fiebre amarilla.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination: a call for action in Italy.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection. The implementation of primary prevention aims to reduce the burden of HPV infection and HPV-related disease. However, HPV-related diseases are still a concern, even in high-income countries. Approximately 570 000 new cervical cancer cases are diagnosed in Italy every year. Prophylactic HPV vaccines have been developed to minimize the spread of HPV. Growing evidence supports the administration of HPV vaccines (even just one dose) in reducing the prevalence of HPV infection and HPV-related disease including cancers. HPV vaccines are characterized by a high level of efficacy (>95%) in women who are naïve to HPV; however, they do not increase clearance in patients with ongoing HPV infection. With more than 200 million doses administered to date, HPV vaccines are considered to be safe and effective at preventing HPV-related infections and cancers. In this review we aim to review the current evidence regarding HPV vaccination and to describe trends in HPV vaccination coverage in Italy. In Italy, vaccination against HPV has been included in the National Immunization Plan (NIP) since 2007-2008. Using data abstracted from the Italian Ministry of Health, we analyzed changes in HPV vaccination coverage. We observed that HPV vaccines are underutilized and coverage rates are decreasing. Looking at the target population (females and males aged 11-12 years) in Italy, a decrease in coverage rates was observed. A call for action, improved HPV awareness, and education are the key elements to enhance the widespread adoption of HPV vaccination.

Parental preferences for rotavirus vaccination for their children under 5 years old in China: A discrete choice experiment.

Rotavirus vaccination is the most effective means to prevent rotavirus gastroenteritis, but its coverage in China is not ideal. We aimed to explore parental preferences for rotavirus vaccination for their children under 5years old to improve vaccination coverage. A Discrete Choice Experiment was conducted online on 415 parents with at least one child under 5years old in 3 cities. Five attributes including vaccine effectiveness, protection duration, risk of mild side-effects, out-of-pocket costs, and time required for vaccination were identified. Each attribute was set at three levels. Mixed-logit models were used to measure parental preferences and the relative importance of vaccine attributes. The optimal vaccination strategy was also explored. 359 samples were included in the analysis. The impacts of the vaccine attribute levels on vaccine choice were all statistically significant (p < .01), except for 1-hour vaccination time. The risk of mild side-effects was the most important factor influencing vaccination. The time required for vaccination was the least important attribute. The largest increase in vaccination uptake (74.45%) occurred with decreased the vaccine risk of mild side-effects from 1/10 to 1/50. The predicted vaccination uptake of the optimal vaccination scenario was 91.79%. When deciding about vaccination, parents preferred the rotavirus vaccination with lower risk of mild side-effects, higher effectiveness, longer protection duration, 2-hour vaccination time and lower cost. The authorities should support enterprises to develop vaccines with lower side-effects, higher effectiveness and longer protection duration in the future. We call for appropriate government subsidies for the rotavirus vaccine.

Boletim informativo epidemiológico: imunização / Epidemiological Newsletter: immunization

Em 2022 houve uma ascensão das coberturas vacinais dos imunobiológicos destinados à população como um todo,tendo em vista um cenário de pandemia e pós pandemia da Covid-19. No decorrer deste ano houveram campanhas nacionais de vacinação da Covid-19, seguimento do sarampo, influenza e multivacinação (atualização da caderneta de vacinação). Portanto esse boletim tem o objetivo de apresentar o panorama das coberturas vacinais de rotina em Goiás, do calendário nacional de vacinação das crianças menores de 2 anos e campanhas, bem como as ações de imunização implementadas em 2022 e os seus desafios

In 2022, there was an increase in vaccine coverage of immunobiologicals intended for the population as a whole, in view of a pandemic and post-pandemic scenario of Covid-19. During this year, there were national vaccination campaigns against Covid-19, monitoring of measles, influenza and multivaccination (vaccination booklet update). Therefore, this bulletin aims to present an overview of routine vaccination coverage in Goiás, the national vaccination schedule for children under 2 years of age and campaigns, as well as the immunization actions implemented in 2022 and their challenges

Social and structural determinants of COVID-19 vaccine uptake among racial and ethnic groups.

Latino, Black, American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN), and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander people have the highest hospitalizations and death rates from COVID-19. Social inequalities have exacerbated COVID-19 related health disparities. This study examines social and structural determinants of COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Results from logistic regressions suggest Latino and Black people were less likely to be vaccinated. People that did not have health insurance, a primary care doctor and were unemployed were more than 30% less likely to be vaccinated for COVID-19. Greater perceived health inequalities in one's neighborhood and perceived racial/ethnic discrimination were associated with a decreased odds in being vaccinated. People that suffered the loss of a household member from COVID-19 were three times more likely to have been vaccinated. Establishing policies that will increase access to health insurance and create jobs with living wages may have lasting impacts. Furthermore, collaboration with local and national community organizations can enhance the development of sustainable solutions.

Cobertura vacinal contra covid-19 em instituições de longa permanência para idosos / Cobertura vacunal contra covid-19 en instituciones de larga estancia para personas mayores / Covid-19 vaccination coverage in long-term institutions for the elderly

Objetivo: analisar a cobertura vacinal contra COVID-19 em Instituições de Longa Permanência para idosos. Método: estudo transversal com dados agregados fornecidos pela Comissão Intersetorial de Acompanhamento das Instituições de Longa Permanência da Bahia. Foram incluídas as instituições identificadas em Salvador, Bahia, Brasil, com pelo menos um residente idoso (60 ou mais anos) que responderam ao inquérito de vacinação realizado entre maio a julho de 2021. Resultados: a amostra foi composta por 83 estabelecimentos, com predomínio de instituições privadas (50,1%) e filantrópicas (32,5%). A cobertura vacinal da COVID-19 atingiu 94,7% dos idosos residentes e 75,2% dos trabalhadores. Conclusão: o estudo mostra alta cobertura vacinal em idosos residentes nestas instituições, porém, menor cobertura entre os trabalhadores. A maximização da cobertura vacinal entre os cuidadores e residentes é fundamental, devido à extrema vulnerabilidade da população idosa institucionalizada à COVID-19.

Objetivo: analizar la cobertura vacunal contra COVID-19 en Instituciones de Larga Permanencia para ancianos. Método: estudio transversal con datos agregados proporcionados por la Comisión Intersectorial de Seguimiento de las Instituciones de Larga Permanencia de Bahía. Se incluyeron las instituciones identificadas en Salvador, Bahía, Brasil, con al menos un residente de edad avanzada (60 o más años) que respondieron a la encuesta de vacunación realizada entre mayo y julio de 2021. Resultados: la muestra fue compuesta por 83 establecimientos, con predominio de instituciones privadas (50,1%) y filantrópicas (32,5%). La cobertura vacunal de COVID-19 alcanzó el 94,7% de los ancianos residentes y el 75,2% de los trabajadores. Conclusión: el estudio muestra alta cobertura vacunal en ancianos residentes en estas instituciones, sin embargo, menor cobertura entre los trabajadores. La maximización de la cobertura vacunal entre cuidadores y residentes es fundamental debido a la extrema vulnerabilidad de la población de edad avanzada institucionalizada a COVID-19.

Objective to analyze vaccination coverage against COVID-19 in long-term care institutions for the elderly. Method: cross-sectional study with aggregated data provided by the Intersectoral Monitoring Commission of Long-Term Institutions of Bahia. We included the institutions identified in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil, with at least one elderly resident (60 years or older) who responded to the vaccination survey conducted between May and July 2021. Results: the sample consisted of 83 establishments, with a predominance of private (50.1%) and philanthropic (32.5%) institutions. Vaccination coverage for COVID-19 reached 94.7% of elderly residents and 75.2% of workers. Conclusion: the study shows high vaccination coverage in elderly residents of these institutions, but lower coverage among workers. Maximizing vaccination coverage among caregivers and residents is essential, due to the extreme vulnerability of the elderly population institutionalized to COVID-19.

Cobertura da vacinação contra papilomavírus humano no Nordeste do Brasil, 2013-2021: estudo descritivo / Human papillomavirus vaccination coverage in Northeast Brazil, 2013-2021: a descriptive study / Cobertura de vacunación contra el virus del papiloma humano en el Nordeste de Brasil, 2013-2021: un estudio descriptivo

Objetivo: descrever a cobertura da vacina contra papilomavírus humano (HPV) na região Nordeste do Brasil, no período de 2013 a 2021. Métodos: estudo descritivo conduzido com dados obtidos do Programa Nacional de Imunizações, que estabelece a meta de 80% para a vacina contra o HPV para meninas entre 9 e 14 anos e meninos entre 11 e 14 anos. Resultados: as coberturas para as meninas foram de 73,9%, na primeira, e de 54,3% na segunda dose, e para meninos, as coberturas de cada dose foram de 49,7% e 32,6%, respectivamente; excetuando-se Ceará e Paraíba, que alcançaram coberturas acima de 80% na primeira dose para as meninas, nenhum estado alcançou a meta para as duas doses. Conclusões: entre 2013 e 2021, as coberturas da vacina contra HPV estiveram abaixo da meta para ambos os sexos, com exceção de Ceará e Paraíba, que atingiram a meta para a primeira dose no grupo de meninas.

Objective: to describe human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination coverage in the Northeast region of Brazil, in the period from 2013 to 2021. Methods: this was a descriptive study conducted with data obtained from the National Immunization Program, which sets a goal of 80% coverage of HPV vaccination in girls aged between 9 and 14 years and boys aged between 11 and 14 years. Results: HPV vaccination coverage in girls was 73.9%, regarding the first dose, and 54.3% regarding the second dose, and for boys, the coverage of each dose was 49.7% and 32.6%, respectively; with the exception of the states of Ceará and Paraíba, which reached coverage above 80% regarding the first dose in girls, none of the states reached the goal for both doses. Conclusions: between 2013 and 2021, HPV vaccination coverage was below the target for both sexes, with the exception of the states of Ceará and Paraíba, which reached the goal for the first dose in the girls.

Objetivo: describir las coberturas de la vacuna contra el papilomavirus humano en la Región Nordeste de Brasil y sus estados, de 2013 a 2021. Métodos: se trata de un estudio descriptivo realizado con datos de cobertura vacunal obtenidos del Programa Nacional de Immunizaciones, que establece la meta del 80% para la vacuna. Los datos de población se obtuvieron del Departamento de Informática del Ministerio de Salud. Resultados: la cobertura de vacunación en niñas fue del 73,9% en la primera y del 54,3% en la segunda dosis; en niños la cobertura de cada dosis fue del 49,7% y 32,6%; Ceará y Paraíba alcanzaron una cobertura superior al 80% para la primera dosis en niñas, y ningún estado alcanzó la meta para las dos dosis. Conclusiones: la cobertura de la vacuna está por debajo de la meta para ambos sexos, con excepción de la primera dosis en niñas en Ceará y Paraíba.

Vacunación antigripal en personal de salud que trabaja con niños en un prestador privado de salud: años 2019 y 2020 / Flu vaccine administered to health care personnel working with children at a private health provider (2019-2020) / Vacina contra influenza administrada a profissionais de saúde que trabalham com crianças numa operadora de saúde privada (2019-2020)

Introducción: la infección por el virus de la gripe genera morbimortalidad. El personal de salud es uno de los grupos prioritarios para ser vacunado. Objetivo: conocer cobertura vacunal contra la gripe del personal de salud que trabaja con niños en CASMU en 2019 y 2020, y las razones por las que se vacunaron o no. Material y método: estudio observacional, descriptivo, transversal. Recolección de datos en 2020 a través de un cuestionario anónimo. Se registraron las siguientes variables: edad, lugar de trabajo (urgencias, internación o policlínica), función, riesgo de enfermedad grave, aplicación o no de vacuna en 2019 y en 2020, y motivos de vacunación o de no vacunación. Resultados: completaron la encuesta 204 trabajadores. En 2019, se vacunó el 73 % y, en 2020, el 77,5 % (p >0,05). El personal de salud de urgencias de Montevideo presentó mayor vacunación (en 2019, el 90,7 %; en 2020, el 93 %), seguido por el personal de salud de urgencias de Ciudad de la Costa e internación. Según la ocupación, para los médicos se registró una vacunación mayor al 95 % (2019 y 2020); para las licenciadas y auxiliares de enfermería, el 68,6 % en 2019 y el 75,7 % en 2020; para el personal no clínico, el 33 % en 2019 y el 41 % en 2020. El aumento de vacunados en 2020 no fue significativo en ninguna de las ocupaciones. El 21 % de los encuestados presentaba riesgo de enfermedad grave; el 65 % de estos se vacunó en 2019 y el 74,4 % en 2020. La totalidad de las embarazadas de la muestra se vacunó. Motivos más frecuentes mencionados de vacunación (2019 y 2020): prevención (50,5 %) y ser personal de salud (36 %). El de quienes no se vacunaron fue "Nunca enfermo" (19 %). Quienes no se administraron la vacuna en 2019, pero sí en 2020, mencionaron más frecuentemente la pandemia como motivo. Conclusión: en CASMU, el porcentaje de trabajadores de la salud en contacto con niños que se adhirió a la vacunación antigripal en 2019 y 2020 fue mayor al 70 %. No se registró aumento significativo por la pandemia. Se debe mejorar la cobertura en policlínicas y del personal de salud no médico, en particular del personal de salud con factores de riesgo de enfermedad grave.

Introduction: the influenza virus infection causes morbidity and mortality. Health care personnel (HCP) is one of the priority groups to be vaccinated. Objective: to learn about HCP's vaccination coverage against influenza of those workers working with children at CASMU in 2019 and 2020, and the reasons why they received vaccination or did not. Material and Methods: observational, descriptive, crosssectional study. Data collection in 2020: anon ymous survey. Variables: age, place of work (emer gency, hospital or clinic), function, risk of serious illness, vaccination received (or not received) in 2019 and 2020 and reasons. Results: 204 workers completed the survey; influenza vaccination: 73% in 2019 and 77.5% in 2020 (p>0.05). Montevideo's Emergency Department presented the highest level of vaccination and hospitalization (2019-90.7%; 2020-93%) followed by the Ciudad de la Costa's Emergency Department. By occupational level: doctors: vaccination> 95% (2019 and 2020); graduates and nursing assistants: 2019-68.6%; 2020- 75.7%; administrative, kitchen, cleaning and gate house staff: 2019-33%, 2020-41%. The increase in vaccinated personnel in 2020 was not significant for any of the occupations. 21% of those surveyed had a risk of serious illness; 65% were vaccinated in 2019 and 74.4% in 2020. All the sampled pregnant women were vaccinated. The most frequent reasons mentioned for vaccination (2019 and 2020): "prevention" (50.5%), being PS (36%). Those who were not vaccinated stated that were "never ill" (19%). Those who had not received the vaccine in 2019, but received in 2020, mostly mentioned the "pandemic" as a reason. Conclusion: in CASMU, the percentage of health workers in contact with children who adhered to the flu vaccination in 2019 and 2020 was higher than 70%. There was no significant increase after to the pandemic. Coverage in polyclinics and nonmedical HCP, in particular those HCP with risk factors for serious diseases, should be improved.

Introdução: a infecção pelo vírus influenza gera morbimortalidade. O pessoal de saúde (PS) é um dos grupos prioritários a ser vacinado. Objetivo: conhecer a cobertura vacinal contra influenza do PS que atende crianças no CASMU em 2019 e 2020, e os motivos pelos quais foram vacinados ou não. Material e Métodos: estudo observacional, descritivo e transversal. Coleta de dados em 2020: questionário anônimo. Variáveis: idade, local de trabalho (emergência, internação ou policlínica), função, anos de trabalho, risco de doença grave, aplicação ou não da vacinação em 2019 e 2020 e motivos. Resultados: 204 trabalhadores responderam à pesquisa; vacinação contra influenza: 73% em 2019 e 77,5% em 2020 (p> 0,05). O pronto socorro de Montevidéu apresentou o maior nível de vacinação (2019-90,7%; 2020-93%) seguido pelo pronto socorro de Ciudad de la Costa e internação. Ocupação: médicos: vacinação> 95% (2019 e 2020); graduados e auxiliares de enfermagem: 2019-68,6%; 2020-75,7%; Pessoal administrativo, cozinha, limpeza e porteiros: 2019-33%, 2020-41%. O aumento de vacinados em 2020 não foi significativo em nenhuma das ocupações. 21% dos entrevistados corriam risco de doenças graves; 65% deles foram vacinados em 2019 e 74,4% em 2020. Todas as gestantes da amostra foram vacinadas. Motivos mais citados para a vacinação (2019 e 2020): "prevenção" (50,5%), sendo PS (36%). Aqueles que não foram vacinados disseram que eles "nunca ficavam doentes" (19%). Os que não receberam a vacina em 2019, mas sim em 2020, citaram com mais frequência a "pandemia" como motivo. Conclusão: no CASMU, a percentagem de profissionais de saúde em contato com crianças que aderiram à vacinação contra gripe em 2019 e 2020 foi superior a 70%. Não houve aumento significativo após a pandemia. A cobertura em policlínicas e profissionais de saúde não médicos e, em particular, profissionais de saúde com fatores de risco para doenças graves, deve ser melhorada.

Socioeconomic and geographic inequities in vaccination among children 12 to 59 months in Mexico, 2012 to 2021 / Inequidades socioeconómicas y geográficas en la vacunación infantil entre los 12 y 59 meses de edad, México, 2012-2021 / Iniquidades socioeconômicas e geográficas na vacinação de crianças entre 12 e 59 meses no México, 2012 a 2021

ABSTRACT Objective. To document the evolution of socioeconomic and geographical inequalities in childhood vaccination in Mexico from 2012 to 2021. Methods. Repeated cross-sectional analysis using three rounds of National Health and Nutrition Surveys (2012, 2018, and 2021). Dichotomous variables were created to identify the proportion of children who received no dose of each vaccine included in the national immunization schedule (BCG; diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus-containing; rotavirus; pneumococcal conjugate; and measles, mumps, and rubella [MMR]), and the proportion completely unvaccinated. The distribution of unvaccinated children was analyzed by state, and by socioeconomic status using the concentration index. Results. The prevalence of completely unvaccinated children in Mexico was low, with 0.3% children in 2012 and 0.8% children in 2021 receiving no vaccines (p = 0.070). Notwithstanding, for each vaccine, an important proportion of children missed receiving any dose. Notably, the prevalence of MMR unvaccinated children was 10.2% (95% CI 9.2-11.1) in 2012, 22.3% (95% CI 20.9-23.8) in 2018, and 29.1% (95% CI 26.3-31.8) in 2021 (p < 0.001 for the difference between 2012 and 2021). The concentration index indicated pro-rich inequalities in non-vaccination for 2 of 5 vaccines in 2012, 3 of 5 vaccines in 2018, and 4 of 5 vaccines in 2021. There were marked subnational variations. The percentage of MMR unvaccinated children ranged from 3.3% to 17.9% in 2012, 5.5% to 36.5% in 2018, and 13.1% to 72.5% in 2021 across the 32 states of Mexico. Conclusions. Equitable access to basic childhood vaccines in Mexico has deteriorated over the past decade. Vigilant equity monitoring coupled with tailored strategies to reach those left out is urgently required.

RESUMEN Objetivo. Documentar la evolución de las inequidades socioeconómicas y geográficas en la vacunación infantil en México del 2012 al 2021. Métodos. Se llevó a cabo un análisis transversal repetido con tres rondas (2012, 2018 y 2021) de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición (ENSANUT). Se crearon variables dicotómicas para determinar la proporción de la población infantil que no había recibido cada una de las vacunas incluidas en el calendario nacional de vacunación (BCG; difteria, tos ferina y tétanos; rotavirus; conjugado neumocócico; y sarampión, parotiditis y rubéola [triple viral]) y la proporción de la población infantil completamente sin vacunar. La distribución de la población infantil sin vacunar se analizó por estado y nivel socioeconómico mediante el índice de concentración. Resultados. La prevalencia de la población infantil completamente sin vacunar en México fue baja, con 0,3% en el 2012 y 0,8% en el 2021 de la población infantil que no recibió ninguna vacuna (p = 0,070). No obstante, en relación con cada vacuna, una gran proporción de población infantil no recibió ninguna dosis. En particular, la prevalencia de la población infantil sin vacunarse con la triple viral fue de 10,2% (IC del 95% 9,2-11,1) en el 2012, 22,3% (IC del 95% 20,9-23,8) en el 2018 y 29,1% (IC del 95 % 26,3-31,8) en el 2021 (p < 0,001 para la diferencia entre el 2012 y el 2021). El índice de concentración reveló desigualdades que favorecen a los estratos más ricos en la probabilidad de no estar vacunado para 2 de las 5 vacunas en 2012, en 3 de las 5 vacunas en 2018, y en 4 de las 5 vacunas en el 2021. Asimismo, hubo marcadas variaciones subnacionales: el porcentaje de la población infantil que no recibió la vacuna triple viral osciló entre 3,3% y 17,9% en el 2012, entre 5,5% y 36,5% en el 2018 y entre 13,1% y 72,5% en el 2021 en los 32 estados de México. Conclusiones. El acceso equitativo a las vacunas infantiles básicas en México se ha deteriorado en el último decenio. Es urgentemente necesario un monitoreo vigilante de la equidad, así como estrategias adaptadas, para poder vacunar a la población al margen.

RESUMO Objetivo. Documentar a evolução das desigualdades socioeconômicas e geográficas na vacinação infantil no México, no período entre 2012 e 2021. Métodos. Foi realizada a análise repetida de dados transversais obtidos em três ciclos da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde e Nutrição do México (2012, 2018 e 2021). Variáveis dicotômicas foram elaboradas para estimar o percentual de crianças que não receberam nenhuma dose de cada uma das vacinas do calendário nacional de vacinação (a saber: vacina BCG, vacina contra difteria, coqueluche e tétano, vacina contra rotavírus, vacina pneumocócica conjugada e vacina contra sarampo, caxumba e rubéola [SCR]) e a proporção de crianças totalmente não vacinadas. O índice de concentração foi usado para analisar a distribuição das crianças não vacinadas por estado e condição socioeconômica. Resultados. A prevalência de crianças totalmente não vacinadas foi baixa no país (0,3% em 2012 e 0,8% em 2021, p = 0,070). Porém, um percentual significativo deixou de receber alguma dose de vacina. A prevalência de crianças não vacinadas com a vacina SCR foi 10,2% (IC 95% 9,2-11,1) em 2012, 22,3% (IC 95% 20,9-23,8) em 2018 e 29,1% (IC 95% 26,3-31,8) em 2021 (p < 0,001 para a diferença entre 2012 e 2021). O índice de concentração indicou desigualdade de renda entre vacinados e não vacinados com relação a 2 das 5 vacinas em 2012, 3 das 5 vacinas em 2018 e 4 das 5 vacinas em 2021. Houve uma grande variação geográfica na vacinação infantil. Em particular, o percentual de não vacinados com a vacina SCR nos 32 estados do país variou de 3,3% a 17,9% em 2012, 5,5% a 36,5% em 2018 e 13,1% a 72,5% em 2021. Conclusões. Ocorreu uma piora no acesso equitativo à vacinação básica infantil na última década no México. É imprescindível monitorar atentamente a equidade e implementar estratégias específicas para garantir a cobertura vacinal de todos.

Boletim Epidemiológico COVID-2019 (RS): semana epidemiológica (SE) 52 de 2022 / Epidemiological Bulletin COVID-2019 (RS): epidemiological week (SE) 52 de 2022

Neste boletim são apresentados: situação mundial, ocorrência de hospitalizações confirmadas para sars-cov-2, perfil das pessoas, distribuição espacial, Síndrome Inflamatória Multissistêmica Pediátrica (SIM-P), povos indígenas, descrição de surtos, trabalhadores da saúde, Vigilância sentinela de síndrome gripal e tabelas de descrição do surto. (AU)